Tis the Season

10/03/06

Permalink 05:20:56 pm, by tracy Email , 216 words, 152 views   English (US)
Categories: General

Tis the Season

The other day I saw TV commericals from two political opponents that basically slammed the other's integrity and made fun of the other person. I guess I am suppose to believe that I should vote for the other candidate because this candidate is just sooooo bad. Hmmmm, it must be election time again.

I must admit that these kind of commercials really grate on me. Why is it so difficult for candidates to create commercials and other literature that focuses on what he or she is going to do once in office and not how bad the other candidate is? Why do we tend to default to name calling and tit-for-tat strategies instead of explaining why the position a candidate chooses to take will be best for those the candidate is representing? Why do I feel like I am voting for the lesser of two evils instead of someone who has worked hard to persuade me with sound arguments and treats his or her opponent with respect? Why?!

And then I ask myself, what is my role in all of this?

Someone, please help me understand...

(BTW, I really didn't mean for this to be a plug for the upcoming Beyond Sunday discussion, it's just an issue I've been thinking about a lot over the years.)

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: annonymous [Visitor]

Do people really listen to politicians? If a candidate were to get on TV and tell me about himself, what he will do for education, taxes, etc., I would (unfortunately) have a "Oh, that's nice. I'll have to see it to believe it" attitude. While this attitude is probably wrong, I think that people are cautious to believe anything politicians say...even if they are telling the truth. So, saying that, I think that is why they use the shock tactic in their campaigns. Cause otherwise they are just another random candidate telling me what I want to hear. It's like when I was in highschool and running for the ASB treasurer position. I assumed that every other candidate that had ever campaigned for the position had probably said they would be great at handling the finances, work really hard to do this, and accomplish that....blah, blah, blah. And I knew that no one was probably going to listen or care what I said anyway. So, when it came time for my election speech I made a joke in the middle of it about some kid in the 3rd row wearing Bugle Boy Jeans. People laughed and I won. Lame story, but I guess my question is, "do people really care, or is it a popularity contest"? Are we a society that bases character on being funny or different, or in the case that you said being the better "basher"? My other thought is...maybe people care more about voting on "issues" rather than candidates. I think I would rather concentrate more on the issues (ballot measures) and which way I will vote on them. It makes me feel like I have an ounce of control in an out of control system. It seems like the record shows that a candidate is probably just telling me what I want to hear, and when elected, doing whatever he wants.
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/06 @ 13:35

Comments are closed for this post.

Tracy's thoughts

August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 30

powered by
b2evolution