The other day I saw TV commericals from two political opponents that basically slammed the other's integrity and made fun of the other person. I guess I am suppose to believe that I should vote for the other candidate because this candidate is just sooooo bad. Hmmmm, it must be election time again.
I must admit that these kind of commercials really grate on me. Why is it so difficult for candidates to create commercials and other literature that focuses on what he or she is going to do once in office and not how bad the other candidate is? Why do we tend to default to name calling and tit-for-tat strategies instead of explaining why the position a candidate chooses to take will be best for those the candidate is representing? Why do I feel like I am voting for the lesser of two evils instead of someone who has worked hard to persuade me with sound arguments and treats his or her opponent with respect? Why?!
And then I ask myself, what is my role in all of this?
Someone, please help me understand...
(BTW, I really didn't mean for this to be a plug for the upcoming Beyond Sunday discussion, it's just an issue I've been thinking about a lot over the years.)
Comments are closed for this post.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |